linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/9] virtio_pci: use shared interrupts for virtqueues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2017 15:54:54 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, mst@...hat.com
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] virtio_pci: use shared interrupts for virtqueues



On 2017年01月27日 16:16, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> +		snprintf(vp_dev->msix_names[i + 1],
> +			 sizeof(*vp_dev->msix_names), "%s-%s",
>   			 dev_name(&vp_dev->vdev.dev), names[i]);
>   		err = request_irq(pci_irq_vector(vp_dev->pci_dev, msix_vec),
> -				  vring_interrupt, 0,
> -				  vp_dev->msix_names[msix_vec],
> -				  vqs[i]);
> +				  vring_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED,
> +				  vp_dev->msix_names[i + 1], vqs[i]);

Do we need to check per_vq_vectors before dereferencing msix_names[i + 1] ?

Thanks