linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/60] staging: lustre: obdclass: add more info to sysfs version string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2017 11:33:04 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
        Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/60] staging: lustre: obdclass: add more info to sysfs
 version string

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 07:04:38PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> From: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
> 
> Update the sysfs "version" file to print "lustre: " with
> the version number.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5969
> Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/16721
> Reviewed-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@...oo.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.eremin@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c
> index 9f5e829..22e6d1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ struct miscdevice obd_psdev = {
>  static ssize_t version_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
>  			    char *buf)
>  {
> -	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", LUSTRE_VERSION_STRING);
> +	return sprintf(buf, "lustre: %s\n", LUSTRE_VERSION_STRING);
>  }

Why?  You "know" this is lustre, why say it again?  Doesn't this affect
userspace tools?

thanks,

greg k-h