linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv7 4/8] printk: always use deferred printk when flush printk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170203111849.GO23754@pathway.suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2017 12:18:49 +0100
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 4/8] printk: always use deferred printk when flush
 printk_safe lines

On Fri 2017-02-03 11:04:18, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (02/02/17 16:52), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > > I am still learning how to manage the patches in the printk.git tree.
> > > 
> > > I would like to add Steven's Reviewed-by tags, links to the mails,
> > > and list of CC-ed people. IMHO, the only way is to rebase the for-4.11
> > > and for-next branches. Then I could do the above suggested change during
> > > the rebase.
> > 
> > Alternatively you could send this other solution as a replay to this
> > thread. Then we could comment, add reviewed tags. And I could use
> > the new approved variant during the rebase.
> > 
> > This is probably better approach for non-oneliner changes.
> 
> by "the new approved variant" do you mean resend of the entire
> patch set (v8) or just 0004 patch?

I depends on how many and how complicated are possible conflicts
with the followup patches.

It is perfectly fine to send just 0004 if there are no conflicts
or if they are trivial to resolve.

Best Regards,
Petr