[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f8b36e38-c1f6-82f8-0ed9-0c934ace44ac@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:16:48 -0500
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, matt@...eblueprint.co.uk
Cc: waiman.long@....com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, tytso@....edu,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, scott.norton@....com,
doug.hatch@....com,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][v4.9.y][v4.10.y] x86/efi: Only map RAM into EFI page
tables if in mixed-mode
On 02/02/2017 03:36 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 02/02/2017 12:17 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel
>> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug:
>>
>> commit 1297667083d5442aafe3e337b9413bf02b114edb
>> Author: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
>> Date: Mon Sep 19 13:09:09 2016 +0100
>>
>> x86/efi: Only map RAM into EFI page tables if in mixed-mode
>>
>>
>> The regression was introduced as of v4.8-rc8. It also still affects
>> current mainline.
>>
>> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do
>> you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue,
>> or would it be best to submit a revert request?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> [0] http://pad.lv/1659340
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> You might try https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148553171703761
> which fixed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384238
>
> Thanks,
> Laura
This patch resolves the bug for multiple users. Thanks again for the
pointer, Laura and Ard!
Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists