[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170203151414.GE16822@rric.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:14:14 +0100
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@...ium.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: mm: Fix NOMAP page initialization
On 17.01.17 19:16:56, Will Deacon wrote:
> I can't really see the trend given that, for system time, your
> pfn_valid_within results have a variance of ~9 and the early_pfn_valid
> results have a variance of ~92. Given that the variance seems to come
> about due to the reboots, I think we need more numbers to establish whether
> the data sets end up largely overlapping or if they really are disjoint.
Assuming the numbers of both versions are not significant, please
apply one or the other.
Thanks,
-Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists