lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 Feb 2017 11:01:10 -0500
From:   Stephen Bash <bash@...arts.com>
To:     Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
Cc:     git@...r.kernel.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Fail git pull --rebase when local merges present? (was: [ANNOUNCE]
 Git v2.11.1)

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com> wrote:

>  * "git pull --rebase", when there is no new commits on our side since
>    we forked from the upstream, should be able to fast-forward without
>    invoking "git rebase", but it didn't.

As someone who has to mentor new developers to Git at my $dayjob, this
is really nice!  Thanks!

Slightly related (in that it's a pitfall of *always* using pull
--rebase), does anyone know if there is a way to make git pull
--rebase fail if there's a local merge?  For our workflow I'd like to
tell new people to just default to pull --rebase, but having to add
(and explain) the "don't rebase a merge" caveat tends to lose them...
(yes we mix merge and rebase; it works for us... most of the time)

Thanks,
Stephen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ