[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170203034618.GI7458@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:16:18 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: use cpumask_var_t for on-stack cpu masks
On 02-02-17, 15:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Putting a bare cpumask structure on the stack produces a warning on
> large SMP configurations:
>
> drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c: In function 'cpufreq_state2power':
> drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:644:1: warning: the frame size of 1056 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c: In function '__cpufreq_cooling_register':
> drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:898:1: warning: the frame size of 1104 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>
> The recommended workaround is to use cpumask_var_t, which behaves just like
> a normal cpu mask in most cases, but turns into a dynamic allocation
> when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists