linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/4] refcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1486164412-7338-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org>
Date:   Fri,  3 Feb 2017 15:26:48 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, elena.reshetova@...el.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...nel.org, h.peter.anvin@...el.com, will.deacon@....com,
        dwindsor@...il.com, Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
        dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] refcount_t followups...

Hi,

After doing some testing on the new refcount_t series, here are some
changes to improve refcount_t for the paranoid case. ;)

Since the new LKDTM tests depend on the new API, please add them to your
series; it doesn't make sense for it to go through drivers-misc.

The first patch (Kconfig fix) could be trivially folded into the initial
refcount_t patch, too.

Thanks!

-Kees