linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH resend 4.9] hw_random: Don't use a stack buffer in add_early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8b98b1e0-2161-6c58-573c-613940e0f31e@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 4 Feb 2017 18:32:46 +0800
From:   Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
        "Jens Axboe" <axboe@...com>, Matt Mullins <mmullins@...x.us>,
        Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>,
        Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 4.9] hw_random: Don't use a stack buffer in
 add_early_randomness()

hi, Matt,
Thanks for your reply.

On 2017/2/4 12:34, Matt Mullins wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 11:47:38AM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
>> On 2016/10/18 1:06, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> hw_random carefully avoids using a stack buffer except in
>>> add_early_randomness().  This causes a crash in virtio_rng if
>>> CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y.
>> I try to understand this patch, but I do not know why it will cause
>> a crash in virtio_rng with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y?
>> Could you please give me more info. about it.
> 
> My original report was
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161016002151.GA18235@hydra.tuxags.com.
> 
> The virtio ring APIs use scatterlists to keep track of the buffers, and
> scatterlist requires addresses to be in the kernel direct-mapped address range.
> This is not the case for vmalloc()ed addresses, such as the original on-stack
> "bytes" array when VMAP_STACK=y.
> 
I see, and will check the logic to get more detail about it.

Thanks.
Yisheng Xie