linux-kernel - Re: Staging: speakup - syle fix permissions to octal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702041527380.1959@hadrien>
Date:   Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:29:20 +0100 (CET)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Derek Robson <robsonde@...il.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, w.d.hubbs@...il.com,
        chris@...-brannons.com, kirk@...sers.ca,
        samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        shraddha.6596@...il.com, alan@...ux.intel.com, shiva@...ev.nl,
        amitoj1606@...il.com, amsfield22@...il.com, bhumirks@...il.com,
        waltfeasel@...il.com, speakup@...ux-speakup.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Staging: speakup - syle fix permissions to octal



On Sat, 4 Feb 2017, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> On 02/03/2017 11:27 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > (adding Julia Lawall)
> >
> > On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 20:44 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 07:05:09PM +1300, Derek Robson wrote:
> > > > A style fix across whole driver.
> > > > changed permissions to octal style, found using checkpatch
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Derek Robson <robsonde@...il.com>
> > >
> > > FWIW, I think changes like this are best done using coccinelle.
> >
> > I think checkpatch does it reasonably well.
> >
> > Julia?  Can coccinelle do this?
> >
> > I believe cocinelle doesn't handle the substitution
> > and octal addition very well when multiple flags
> > are used.
> >
>
> Why not ? Seems to be quite simple. One just has to list all the variants
> being used in the rule.
>
> > > That ensures that the results can be reproduced and are well defined.
> > > As it is, someone will have to check each line of your patches to ensure
> > > that the conversion is correct.
> > >
> > > It would also ensure (hopefully) that we don't end up with constructs
> > > such as
> > >
> > > > -#define USER_R (S_IFREG|S_IRUGO)
> > > > -#define USER_W (S_IFREG|S_IWUGO)
> > > > +#define USER_R (S_IFREG|0444)
> > > > +#define USER_W (S_IFREG|0666)
> > >
> > > which really defeat the purpose of the whole exercise.
> >
> > Why do you think mixing file specific attributes
> > with octal permissions is a bad thing?
> >
>
> Just an assumption. My bad. Ultimately, what I think doesn't really
> matter, though - because what I think is that the whole "use octals"
> is a bad idea to start with.

I don't think I have received yet the message that this is referring to.
But I don't see a problem for Coccinelle a priori.  If there are things
that need to be added together, as long as they are explicit constants,
that can be done in python or ocaml.

julia