[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6efd793f-944d-53e6-9b4b-1a78ea835cf5@mentor.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 18:10:14 +0200
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
CC: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Alison Wang <alison.wang@...escale.com>,
Xinliang Liu <z.liuxinliang@...ilicon.com>,
Rongrong Zou <zourongrong@...il.com>,
Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>,
Chen Feng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
Mali DP Maintainers <malidp@...s.arm.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] of: introduce of_graph_get_remote_node
Hi Rob,
On 02/04/2017 05:36 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> The OF graph API leaves too much of the graph walking to clients when
> in many cases the driver doesn't care about accessing the port or
> endpoint nodes. The drivers typically just want the device connected via
> a particular graph connection. of_graph_get_remote_node provides this
> functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/of/base.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/of_graph.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index d4bea3c797d6..ea18ab16b92c 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -2469,3 +2469,31 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_port(const struct device_node *node)
> return of_get_next_parent(np);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_remote_port);
> +
> +struct device_node *of_graph_get_remote_node(const struct device_node *node,
> + int port, int endpoint)
it would be nice to add a short comment that a returned device
node is expected to be dereferenced with of_node_put().
> +{
> + struct device_node *endpoint_node, *remote;
> +
> + endpoint_node = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(node, port, endpoint);
> + if (!endpoint_node) {
> + pr_debug("no valid endpoint (%d, %d) for node %s\n",
> + port, endpoint, node->full_name);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + remote = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint_node);
> + of_node_put(endpoint);
Typo, here it should be of_node_put(endpoint_node);
> + if (!remote) {
> + pr_debug("no valid remote node\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!of_device_is_available(remote)) {
> + pr_debug("not available for remote node\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return remote;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_get_remote_node);
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists