[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpeguuL9ng4-QmpX=BvZtA3=QtvEWQUSW21d5sPYmzmSA9Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 23:12:48 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux NFS list <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] iov_iter: allow iov_iter_get_pages_alloc to
allocate more pages per call
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 03:08:42AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> What am I missing here? Looks like those checks in fuse_copy_page() are
> dead code... They had been there since the initial merge, but AFAICS
> they were just as useless in 2.6.14. Rudiments of some prehistorical stuff
> that never had been cleaned out, perhaps?
Yep, that one is probably historical. I'll double check to make sure, though.
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists