linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] fujitsu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170204004425.GB38511@f23x64.localdomain>
Date:   Sat, 4 Feb 2017 01:44:25 +0100
From:   Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>,
        Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] fujitsu_init() cleanup

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:13:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl> wrote:
> > Darren, Andy,
> >
> > Please drop this patch series for now.  I will send a rebased v2 after a
> > long overdue patch series from Alan Jenkins gets applied in a reworked
> > form.
> 
> Noted.
> 
> Just for you information. Our repo now consists three branches: fixes,
> for-next, and testing. testing is kinda for internal use, it might be
> broken or be in a wrong state.
> Better to use for-next as a base. For this cycle (which is my first as

In general, you should be able to use Linus' master as the base. Only if you
require patches already in for-next, should you use for-next.


-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center