lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170205154046.GF6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Sun, 5 Feb 2017 16:40:46 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     elena.reshetova@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
        h.peter.anvin@...el.com, will.deacon@....com, dwindsor@...il.com,
        Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>, dhowells@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] refcount: Report failures through
 CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 03:26:52PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> This converts from WARN_ON() to CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION() in the
> CONFIG_DEBUG_REFCOUNT case. Additionally moves refcount_t sanity check
> conditionals into regular function flow. Since CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION()
> is marked __much_check, we override few cases where the failure has
> already been handled but we want to explicitly report it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/refcount.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  lib/Kconfig.debug        |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/refcount.h b/include/linux/refcount.h
> index 5b89cad62237..ef32910c7dd8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/refcount.h
> +++ b/include/linux/refcount.h
> @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  
>  #if CONFIG_DEBUG_REFCOUNT
> -#define REFCOUNT_WARN(cond, str) WARN_ON(cond)
> +#define REFCOUNT_CHECK(cond, str) CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(cond, str)

OK, so that goes back to a full WARN() which will make the generated
code gigantic due to the whole printk() trainwreck :/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ