[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170205081226.3c3c681e@GL552JX>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 08:12:26 +0100
From: AbdAllah MEZITI <abdallah.meziti.pro@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
swarren@...dotorg.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Michael Zoran <mzoran@...wfest.net>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] somedriver: remove the initialization of static
pointers.
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 01:29:43 +0100
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 08:39:21PM +0100, AbdAllah-MEZITI wrote:
> > In C a static pointer will be initialized to NULL (e.g: draft C99
> > standard $6.7.8): "If an object that has static storage duration is
> > not initialized explicitly, then:
> > __ if it has pointer type, it is initialized to a null pointer;"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AbdAllah-MEZITI <abdallah.meziti.pro@...il.com>
>
> Your subject is very odd :(
>
> And is that the correct spelling of your name that you use for legal
> documents? If not, please fix up when you resend this.
>
> Also, fix the line-wrapping of your changelog, and the C99 standard is
> not a "draft" anymore, it was released in 1999 :)
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Do not worry, this is just an answer to the Task 10 of the Eudyptula Challenge.
yes, this is the correct spelling of my name that i use for legal documents.
OK.
AbdAllah MEZITI.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists