lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170206102329.04879df9@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:23:29 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with the qcom tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got conflicts in:

  arch/arm/kernel/armksyms.c
  arch/arm64/kernel/arm64ksyms.c
  arch/arm64/kernel/smccc-call.S
  include/linux/arm-smccc.h

between commits:

  0a0c5b832751 ("arm: kernel: Add SMC structure parameter")
  9c96e7f72029 ("firmware: qcom: scm: Fix interrupted SCM calls")

from the qcom tree and commits:

  680a0873e193 ("arm: kernel: Add SMC structure parameter")
  82bcd087029f ("firmware: qcom: scm: Fix interrupted SCM calls")

from the arm64 tree.

I fixed it up (please check the final resolution when it is released,
or fix these up) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ