linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] net: mvneta: implement .set_wol and .get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:08:48 +0800
From:   Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jingju Hou <houjingj@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] net: mvneta: implement .set_wol and
 .get_wol

Hi Andrew,

On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 19:10:34 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote:

> 
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:55:07PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > From: Jingju Hou <houjingj@...vell.com>
> > 
> > From: Jingju Hou <houjingj@...vell.com>
> > 
> > The mvneta itself does not support WOL, but the PHY might.
> > So pass the calls to the PHY
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jingju Hou <houjingj@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
> > ---
> > since v3:
> >  - really fix the build error  
> 
> Keep trying....
> 
> But maybe tomorrow, after you have taken the pause Dave said you
> should take, and maybe ask Jingju to really review it, in detail.

Jingju is a newbie in the Linux kernel community. She made a mistake
when trying to send the old patch. I picked up her patch when she went
on vacation, fixed the error and send it out on behalf of her.

> 
> > 
> > since v2,v1:
> >  - using phy_dev member in struct net_device
> >  - add commit msg
> > 
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > index 6dcc951af0ff..02611fa1c3b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> > @@ -3929,6 +3929,25 @@ static int mvneta_ethtool_get_rxfh(struct net_device *dev, u32 *indir, u8 *key,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void mvneta_ethtool_get_wol(struct net_device *dev,
> > +				   struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> > +{
> > +	wol->supported = 0;
> > +	wol->wolopts = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (dev->phydev)
> > +		return phy_ethtool_get_wol(dev->phydev, wol);  
> 
> This is a void function.  And you are returning a value.  And
> phy_ethtool_get_wol() is also a void function, so does not actually
> return anything.

Thanks for catching it, fixed in v4, can you please review?