lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170206101851.GU3140@e110455-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:18:51 +0000
From:   Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
        Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
        Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        Alison Wang <alison.wang@...escale.com>,
        Xinliang Liu <z.liuxinliang@...ilicon.com>,
        Rongrong Zou <zourongrong@...il.com>,
        Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>,
        Chen Feng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
        Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Mali DP Maintainers <malidp@...s.arm.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
        Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm: of: introduce drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 09:36:32PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Many drivers have a common pattern of searching the OF graph for either an
> attached panel or bridge and then finding the DRM struct for the panel
> or bridge. Also, most drivers need to handle deferred probing when the
> DRM device is not yet instantiated. Create a common function,
> drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge, to find the connected node and the
> associated DRM panel or bridge device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/drm/drm_of.h     | 13 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> index 47848ed8ca48..b29ce2f52113 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
> @@ -3,7 +3,9 @@
>  #include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/of_graph.h>
>  #include <drm/drmP.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_crtc.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_of.h>
>  
>  static void drm_release_of(struct device *dev, void *data)
> @@ -207,3 +209,51 @@ int drm_of_encoder_active_endpoint(struct device_node *node,
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_of_encoder_active_endpoint);
> +
> +/*
> + * drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge - return connected panel or bridge device
> + * @np: device tree node containing encoder input ports
> + * @panel: pointer to hold returned drm_panel
> + * @bridge: pointer to hold returned drm_bridge
> + *
> + * Given a DT node's port and endpoint number, find the connected node and
> + * return either the associated struct drm_panel or drm_bridge device.
> + *
> + * Returns zero if successful, or one of the standard error codes if it fails.
> + */
> +int drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(const struct device_node *np,
> +				int port, int endpoint,
> +				struct drm_panel **panel,
> +				struct drm_bridge **bridge)
> +{
> +	int ret = -ENODEV;

Given that you never return 'ret' with -ENODEV can I suggest that you initialise 'ret'
with -EPROBE_DEFER and then you can get rid of the two assignments further down?

Otherwise, looks good to me.

Best regards,
Liviu

> +	struct device_node *remote;
> +
> +	remote = of_graph_get_remote_node(np, port, endpoint);
> +	if (!remote)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (bridge)
> +		*bridge = NULL;
> +
> +	if (panel) {
> +		*panel = of_drm_find_panel(remote);
> +		if (*panel) {
> +			ret = 0;
> +			goto out_put;
> +		}
> +		ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (bridge) {
> +		*bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(remote);
> +		if (*bridge)
> +			ret = 0;
> +		else
> +			ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +	}
> +out_put:
> +	of_node_put(remote);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge);
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_of.h b/include/drm/drm_of.h
> index 26a64805cc15..f86507f0599b 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_of.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_of.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ struct component_match;
>  struct device;
>  struct drm_device;
>  struct drm_encoder;
> +struct drm_panel;
> +struct drm_bridge;
>  struct device_node;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> @@ -23,6 +25,10 @@ extern int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
>  extern int drm_of_encoder_active_endpoint(struct device_node *node,
>  					  struct drm_encoder *encoder,
>  					  struct of_endpoint *endpoint);
> +extern int drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(const struct device_node *np,
> +				       int port, int endpoint,
> +				       struct drm_panel **panel,
> +				       struct drm_bridge **bridge);
>  #else
>  static inline uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct drm_device *dev,
>  						  struct device_node *port)
> @@ -52,6 +58,13 @@ static inline int drm_of_encoder_active_endpoint(struct device_node *node,
>  {
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
> +static inline int drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(const struct device_node *np,
> +					      int port, int endpoint,
> +					      struct drm_panel **panel,
> +					      struct drm_bridge **bridge)
> +{
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  static inline int drm_of_encoder_active_endpoint_id(struct device_node *node,
> -- 
> 2.10.1
> 

-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ