linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/tinydrm: Add MIPI DBI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 06 Feb 2017 13:25:17 +0200
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/tinydrm: Add MIPI DBI support

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org> wrote:
> +static bool mipi_dbi_command_is_read(struct mipi_dbi *mipi, u8 cmd)

Okay this is one giant bikeshedding nitpick, but here goes anyway. Why
do you call MIPI DBI just "mipi", here and all around? Why not
"mipi_dbi" or "dbi"? We never talk about "vesa" displays or use that as
a shorthand when we refer to Display Port either.

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center