[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a0e4034-007e-d5cf-27ff-eb382ead776e@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:49:07 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] serial: exar: split out the exar code from
8250_pci
On 2017-02-03 22:31, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Friday 03 February 2017 02:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> BTW, are you personally the copyright holder or your employer Codethink?
>> Depends on your contractual situation, but the former is less common.
>
> Well, Codethink has nothing to do with this patch. This was a voluntary
> work started before I joined Codethink, but then I joined Codethink and
> found very little time to finish this. So finally now its done.
>
> https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/2015-November/015372.html
>
Hmm, why using your corporate email address then? This suggests a
different copyright situation.
Funnily, I just received this question internally: How can you tell
apart if someone sends a personal contribution via his/her employer
account from someone contributing on behalf of a company, thus with that
company holding the rights? I argued that no one would do the former to
prevent wrong accounting, but you just proved a counterexample. :)
Regards,
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
Powered by blists - more mailing lists