linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <02e4c88a-2a29-3f6a-abf8-26689d3368ae@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2017 06:46:39 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/319] 3.10.105-stable review

On 02/06/2017 12:13 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 08:09:04PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.105 release.
>>
>> NOTE! This series is quite large as I've caught up with many pending fixes
>> that were submitted for -stable long ago and that I had been holding on
>> since 3.10.103 due to limited time. Most fixes address stability issues
>> in crypto, net, usb, scsi, kvm, random info leaks, and risks of oopses
>> in various subsystems. My pending queue is now empty.
>>
>> It builds fine here on i586 and x86_64 for allmodconfig and on armv7 with
>> mvebu_defconfig.
>>
>> All patches will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any
>> issue with these being applied, please let me know. If anyone thinks some
>> important patches are missing and should be added prior to the release,
>> please report them quickly with their respective mainline commit IDs.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Fri Feb 10 10:00:00 CET 2017.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late. If someone
>> wants a bit more time for a deeper review, please let me know.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at :
>>    https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.105-rc1.gz
>
> An updated patch was pushed here :
>
>   https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.105-rc2.gz
>

Better, but unfortunately there is now a different build error.

Build results:
	total: 124 pass: 122 fail: 2
Failed builds:
	x86_64:allyesconfig
	x86_64:allmodconfig

Qemu test results:
	total: 83 pass: 83 fail: 0

Build error:

drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h: In function 'blkif_get_x86_32_req':
drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h:272:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'READ_ONCE'

Guenter