lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 06 Feb 2017 16:30:25 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 6/7] bpf: Use the bpf_load_program() from
 the library

On 02/06/2017 12:14 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Replace bpf_prog_load() with bpf_load_program() calls.
>
> Use the tools include directory instead of the installed one to allow
> builds from other kernels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile        |  6 +++++-
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_sys.h       | 21 ---------------------
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tag.c      |  6 ++++--
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c |  8 +++++---
>   4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

No objections, but if so, can't we add the remaining missing
pieces to bpf lib, so we can remove bpf_sys.h altogether?

Thanks,
Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ