[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58989FA0.7000906@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 08:09:04 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 7/7] bpf: Always test unprivileged programs
On 2/5/17 3:14 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> - if (unpriv && test->prog_type)
> - continue;
> + if (!test->prog_type) {
> + if (!unpriv)
> + set_admin(false);
> + printf("#%d/u %s ", i, test->descr);
> + do_test_single(test, true, &passes, &errors);
> + if (!unpriv)
> + set_admin(true);
> + }
>
> - printf("#%d %s ", i, test->descr);
> - do_test_single(test, unpriv, &passes, &errors);
> + if (!unpriv) {
> + printf("#%d/p %s ", i, test->descr);
> + do_test_single(test, false, &passes, &errors);
> + }
great idea.
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
as far as other patches.. we need to figure out how to avoid conflicts
between net-next and Arnaldo's tree where Joe's patches went.
Mickael,
can you see some way of splitting the patch set between trees?
Like above test_verfier.c improvement needs to go into net-next.
The rest can go via perf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists