lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3A2AD5BB@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2017 18:54:27 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Shivappa, Vikas" <vikas.shivappa@...el.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        x86 <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
        "Anvin, H Peter" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/12] Cqm2: Intel Cache quality monitoring fixes

Digging through the e-mails from last week to generate a new version
of the requirements I looked harder at this:

> 12) Whatever fs or syscall is provided instead of perf syscalls, it
> should provide total_time_enabled in the way perf does, otherwise is
> hard to interpret MBM values.

This looks tricky if we are piggy-backing on the CAT code to switch
RMID along with CLOSID at context switch time.  We could get an
approximation by adding:

	if (newRMID != oldRMID) {
		now = grab current time in some format
		atomic_add(rmid_enabled_time[oldRMID], now - this_cpu_read(rmid_time));
		this_cpu_write(rmid_time, now);
	}

but:

1) that would only work on a single socket machine (we'd really want rmid_enabled_time
separately for each socket)
2) when we want to read that enabled time, we'd really need to add time for all the
threads currently running on CPUs across the system since we last switched RMID
3) reading the time and doing atomic ops in context switch code won't be popular

:-(

-Tony


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ