linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] serial: exar: split out the exar code from 8250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20aa6454-e102-3ec6-32d7-9b046ba6fc55@siemens.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:47:07 +0100
From:   Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] serial: exar: split out the exar code from
 8250_pci

On 2017-02-06 20:37, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-01-30 23:28, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
>>
>> Add the serial driver for the Exar chips. And also register the
>> platform device for the GPIO provided by the Exar chips.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
> 
> ...
> 
>> +static int default_setup(struct exar8250 *priv, struct pci_dev *pcidev,
>> +			 int idx, unsigned int offset,
>> +			 struct uart_8250_port *port)
>> +{
>> +	const struct exar8250_board *board = priv->board;
>> +	unsigned int bar = 0;
>> +
>> +	port->port.iotype = UPIO_MEM;
>> +	port->port.mapbase = pci_resource_start(pcidev, bar) + offset;
>> +	port->port.membase = pcim_iomap_table(pcidev)[bar] + offset;
> 
> This always gives you 0 for membase because you missed to call
> pcim_iomap for bar 0.
> 
> Sorry to pick on this piece-wise, but I just ran into this bug now while
> porting patches over.
> 
>> +	port->port.regshift = board->reg_shift;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +pci_connect_tech_setup(struct exar8250 *priv, struct pci_dev *pcidev,
>> +		       struct uart_8250_port *port, int idx)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned int offset = idx * 0x200;
>> +	unsigned int baud = 1843200;
>> +
>> +	port->port.uartclk = baud * 16;
>> +	return default_setup(priv, pcidev, idx, offset, port);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +pci_xr17c154_setup(struct exar8250 *priv, struct pci_dev *pcidev,
>> +		   struct uart_8250_port *port, int idx)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned int offset = idx * 0x200;
>> +	unsigned int baud = 921600;
>> +
>> +	port->port.uartclk = baud * 16;
>> +	return default_setup(priv, pcidev, idx, offset, port);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void setup_gpio(u8 __iomem *p)
>> +{
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOINT_7_0);
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOLVL_7_0);
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIO3T_7_0);
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOINV_7_0);
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOSEL_7_0);
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOOD_7_0);
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOINT_15_8);
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOLVL_15_8);
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIO3T_15_8);
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOINV_15_8);
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOSEL_15_8);
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_MPIOOD_15_8);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void *
>> +xr17v35x_register_gpio(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
>> +{
>> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
>> +
>> +	pdev = platform_device_alloc("gpio_exar", PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO);
>> +	if (!pdev)
>> +		return NULL;
>> +
>> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcidev);
>> +	if (platform_device_add(pdev) < 0) {
>> +		platform_device_put(pdev);
>> +		return NULL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return pdev;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +pci_xr17v35x_setup(struct exar8250 *priv, struct pci_dev *pcidev,
>> +		   struct uart_8250_port *port, int idx)
>> +{
>> +	const struct exar8250_board *board = priv->board;
>> +	unsigned int offset = idx * 0x400;
>> +	unsigned int baud = 7812500;
>> +	u8 __iomem *p;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	port->port.uartclk = baud * 16;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Setup the uart clock for the devices on expansion slot to
>> +	 * half the clock speed of the main chip (which is 125MHz)
>> +	 */
>> +	if (board->has_slave && idx >= 8)
>> +		port->port.uartclk /= 2;
>> +
>> +	p = pci_ioremap_bar(pcidev, 0);
> 
> If we move the default_setup before this, we can use pcim_iomap_table()
> and avoid this temporary mapping completely.

Actually, we should use port->port.membase here: The original code that
came from 8250_pci was broken already by always programming port 0,
irrespective of idx. Using membase, we will pick the right address for
the target port.

Jan

> 
>> +	if (!p)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	/* Setup Multipurpose Input/Output pins. */
>> +	if (idx == 0)
>> +		setup_gpio(p);
>> +
>> +	writeb(0x00, p + UART_EXAR_8XMODE);
>> +	writeb(UART_FCTR_EXAR_TRGD, p + UART_EXAR_FCTR);
>> +	writeb(128, p + UART_EXAR_TXTRG);
>> +	writeb(128, p + UART_EXAR_RXTRG);
>> +	iounmap(p);
>> +
>> +	ret = default_setup(priv, pcidev, idx, offset, port);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	if (idx == 0)
>> +		port->port.private_data =
>> +			xr17v35x_register_gpio(pcidev);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> 
> I suppose I should still send patches on top, right?
> 
> Jan
> 

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux