linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/9] ARM: sunxi: Rename pwm0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170206174635.wvl7fnxjhmr6e7zc@lukather>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2017 18:46:35 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] ARM: sunxi: Rename pwm0_pins to match our usual
 pattern

On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 03:15:15PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> > The pwm0_pins group name is suggesting that this is the only option usable
> > for the PWM0 on the SoCs it's declared on. However, this is not the case
> > and defining a second pwm0 group would be quite weird given the name of the
> > first group.
> 
> Can you elaborate on the second pwm0 option? I'm not seeing it in my datasheets.

Hmmmm, I'm not sure why I did that anymore, looks like you're right...

I'll drop this one, and queue the others for 4.12.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)