[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzfiW-BrUD4fD-1H=oxTnTXNbFJEvo+kHvPgXqaVOnExA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:21:13 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 57/89] sched/headers: Split <linux/sched/task_stack> out
of <linux/sched.h>
So this was another of those "lots of noise, hiding the actual changes".
And in the midst of all that noise was this fixup:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/tile/mm/fault.c b/arch/tile/mm/fault.c
> index 1e0509a4c8bd..f58fa06a2214 100644
> --- a/arch/tile/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/tile/mm/fault.c
> @@ -17,11 +17,8 @@
> #include <linux/signal.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
> -<<<<<<< HEAD
> -=======
> #include <linux/sched/task.h>
> #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
> ->>>>>>> 9ecfbdbd2d46... fork.h fixes
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
which obviously means that I didn't even notice this other conflict
marker earlier in the series.
Anyway, I'm finding the end result pleasing, but the steps having
small issues like this really makes me want the final series to be
cleaned-up.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists