linux-kernel - Re: pciehp is broken from 4.10-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2017 22:35:28 +0100
From:   Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pciehp is broken from 4.10-rc1

On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 12:37:06PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 08:34:54AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > @Mika, Rafael: Are you aware of Skylake machines with unreliable link
> > training, or perhaps errata of Skylake chips related to link training
> > on hotplug ports?
> 
> According to the 100-series (the chipset used with Skylake) errata
> below, I don't see any mentions related to PCIe link training issues.
> 
> http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/specification-updates/100-series-chipset-spec-update.pdf

Yinghai Lu responded off-list that the hardware in question is an
unreleased / secret Intel product, so this particular issue cannot
be expected to be documented publicly at this point.

Of course this raises the question whether issues with unreleased
products can at all be considered valid regressions, given that the
final product may not regress.  It seems like a novelty to me that
patches would get reverted for something like this, but we'll see.

Lukas