[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170206220308.GA7481@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 23:03:08 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 78/89] sched/core: Remove the tsk_cpus_allowed() wrapper
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c
> > - cpumask_copy(&cpus_allowed, tsk_cpus_allowed(current));
> > + cpumask_copy(&cpus_allowed, ¤t->cpus_allowed);
>
> Note that all those, and this is where I stopped looking, appear broken vs
> userspace changing the mask right after.
But these are pre-existing bugs in code twidding ->cpus_allowed, not caused by my
patch, right?
I.e. my changes made you notice pre-existing bugs.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists