linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] serial: exar: split out the exar code from 8250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5898F3A1.2050004@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 06 Feb 2017 22:07:29 +0000
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
CC:     Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] serial: exar: split out the exar code from 8250_pci

On Monday 06 February 2017 02:06 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 02:49:07PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2017-02-03 22:31, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>> On Friday 03 February 2017 02:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> BTW, are you personally the copyright holder or your employer Codethink?
>>>> Depends on your contractual situation, but the former is less common.
>>>
>>> Well, Codethink has nothing to do with this patch. This was a voluntary
>>> work started before I joined Codethink, but then I joined Codethink and
>>> found very little time to finish this. So finally now its done.
>>>
>>> https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/2015-November/015372.html
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, why using your corporate email address then? This suggests a
>> different copyright situation.
>>
>> Funnily, I just received this question internally: How can you tell
>> apart if someone sends a personal contribution via his/her employer
>> account from someone contributing on behalf of a company, thus with that
>> company holding the rights? I argued that no one would do the former to
>> prevent wrong accounting, but you just proved a counterexample. :)
>
> There are numerous companies that do this, some create whole shell
> orginizations in order to "hide" their kernel contributions for various
> "interesting" reasons.
>
> Fun stuff.  I suggest having your internal people talk to your lawyers,
> they should know all about this (and if not, have those lawyers talk to
> the LF lawyers...)
>
> But that's not the issue here, we know Sudip :)

:)

Regards
Sudip