[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170207081321.GA28595@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:13:21 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 57/89] sched/headers: Split <linux/sched/task_stack> out
of <linux/sched.h>
* Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Wondering why Git allowed me to be so stupid with those leftover merge markers.
> > Git usually doesn't even allow me to commit them so I have these tuned out as a
> > possibility. This was just a regular git rebase -i flow, to back-merge fixes and
> > reorder/squash patches - nothing fancy that I remember - only the occasional
> > --onto option. I'm using Git 2.7.4.
>
> Git complains about the merge conflicts, and refuses to commit the result
> as long as you haven't resolved them, but it will happily commit everything
> you add using "git add -u", incl. merge markers.
Hm, it should really force that via 'git add -f' or such. The merge markers are
_very_ infrequent as naturally occuring source code lines even on a per line basis
- and especially the combination of them should be exceedingly unique.
I frequently use:
git add $(git ls-files -m)
... to stage edits without comitting them, probably that workflow is what caused
this bug.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists