linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v4 2nd 1/4] ramoops: Add __ramoops_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:51:28 +0000
From:   岩松信洋 / IWAMATSU，NOBUHIRO 
        <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.kw@...achi.com>
To:     Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
        Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        阿口誠司 / AGUCHI，SEIJI 
        <seiji.aguchi.tr@...achi.com>, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 2nd 1/4] ramoops: Add __ramoops_init_prz() as generic
 function

Hi,

Thanks for your review.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Salyzyn [mailto:salyzyn@...roid.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 7:13 AM
> To: 岩松信洋 / IWAMATSU，NOBUHIRO; Anton Vorontsov; Colin Cross; Kees Cook;
> Tony Luck
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Hiraku Toyooka; 阿口誠司 / AGUCHI，
> SEIJI; Shuah Khan
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2nd 1/4] ramoops: Add __ramoops_init_prz() as generic
> function
> 
> On 01/30/2017 05:58 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > +
> > +	if (zap && *paddr + sz - cxt->phys_addr > cxt->size) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "no room for %s mem region (0x%zx@...llx) in
> (0x%lx@...llx)\n",
> > +			name, sz, (unsigned long long)*paddr,
> > +			cxt->size, (unsigned long long)cxt->phys_addr);
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
> > +
> Why not allow this limit check for ramoops_init_prsz call?
> 

This code is controlled by flag of zap.
If zap is false, __ramoops_init_prz() is worked same as original ramoops_init_przs().

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro