[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170207095349.GA10388@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 01:53:49 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Dongsu Park <dongsu@...ocode.com>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...glemail.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Phil Estes <estesp@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] shiftfs: uid/gid shifting bind mount
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:39:48AM +0100, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> I proposed an RFC months ago which implements all of this at the VFS
> layer [1], I received some feedback especially from Dave Chinner,
> however I failed to fix my bugs and improve it not enough resources...
And none of the issues goes away by hiding them in a stackable fs,
in fact many of them are getting worse.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists