linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: aacraid: rcode is unsigned, so can never be less than zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ebdf99a4-667a-8d83-f927-2a0dabf273ca@canonical.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:37:43 +0000
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions <aacraid@...rosemi.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: aacraid: rcode is unsigned, so can never be less
 than zero

On 07/02/17 11:37, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 11:27:38AM +0000, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> The check on rcode >= 0 is always true because rcode is unsigned
>> and can never be less than zero.  Remove the redundant check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c b/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c
>> index 3b5ddf4..ddfd726 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/aacraid/aachba.c
>> @@ -1848,7 +1848,7 @@ int aac_report_phys_luns(struct aac_dev *dev, struct fib *fibptr, int rescan)
>>  			FsaNormal, 1, 1, NULL, NULL);
>>  
>>  	/* analyse data */
>> -	if (rcode >= 0 && phys_luns->resp_flag == 2) {
> 
> The original code is buggy.  rcode should be an int.

Thanks for spotting that. Oops.

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>