lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue,  7 Feb 2017 13:59:08 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Michael A. Tebolt" <miket@...ibm.com>,
        "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 34/66] vhost: fix initialization for vq->is_le

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit cda8bba0f99d25d2061c531113c14fa41effc3ae upstream.

Currently, under certain circumstances vhost_init_is_le does just a part
of the initialization job, and depends on vhost_reset_is_le being called
too. For this reason vhost_vq_init_access used to call vhost_reset_is_le
when vq->private_data is NULL. This is not only counter intuitive, but
also real a problem because it breaks vhost_net. The bug was introduced to
vhost_net with commit 2751c9882b94 ("vhost: cross-endian support for
legacy devices"). The symptom is corruption of the vq's used.idx field
(virtio) after VHOST_NET_SET_BACKEND was issued as a part of the vhost
shutdown on a vq with pending descriptors.

Let us make sure the outcome of vhost_init_is_le never depend on the state
it is actually supposed to initialize, and fix virtio_net by removing the
reset from vhost_vq_init_access.

With the above, there is no reason for vhost_reset_is_le to do just half
of the job. Let us make vhost_reset_is_le reinitialize is_le.

Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Michael A. Tebolt <miket@...ibm.com>
Reported-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@...hat.com>
Fixes: commit 2751c9882b94 ("vhost: cross-endian support for legacy devices")
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>
Tested-by: Michael A. Tebolt <miket@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/vhost/vhost.c |   10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -130,14 +130,14 @@ static long vhost_get_vring_endian(struc
 
 static void vhost_init_is_le(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
 {
-	if (vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
-		vq->is_le = true;
+	vq->is_le = vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)
+		|| virtio_legacy_is_little_endian();
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_VHOST_CROSS_ENDIAN_LEGACY */
 
 static void vhost_reset_is_le(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
 {
-	vq->is_le = virtio_legacy_is_little_endian();
+	vhost_init_is_le(vq);
 }
 
 struct vhost_flush_struct {
@@ -1713,10 +1713,8 @@ int vhost_vq_init_access(struct vhost_vi
 	int r;
 	bool is_le = vq->is_le;
 
-	if (!vq->private_data) {
-		vhost_reset_is_le(vq);
+	if (!vq->private_data)
 		return 0;
-	}
 
 	vhost_init_is_le(vq);
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ