[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28294.1486488555@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:29:15 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
ngupta@...are.org, zhouxianrong@...wei.com, zhouxiyu@...wei.com,
weidu.du@...wei.com, zhangshiming5@...wei.com,
Mi.Sophia.Wang@...wei.com, won.ho.park@...wei.com
Subject: Re: memfill
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> You've misunderstood the purpose of memfill. memfill allows the caller
> to specify a pattern which is not a single byte in size, eg memfill(addr,
> 0x12345678, 64) would result in 0x12345678 being reproduced 16 times.
> memset(addr, 0x12345678, 64) would result in 0x78 being reproduced
> 64 times.
Ah. Should it take a unsigned int rather than an unsigned long?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists