lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2017 20:42:54 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Tobias Guggenmos <slartibartfas421@...il.com>,
        Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rtlwifi: rtl8192c_common: "BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds"

On 07.02.2017 20:22, Tobias Guggenmos wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 5. Februar 2017, 11:30:30 CET schrieb Larry Finger:
>> On 02/05/2017 05:34 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> BTW, I have an issue with the 8192cu: WiFi stops to work after a while
>>> (3-15 minutes) if I enable WMM QoS on the AP. There is nothing suspicious
>>> in KMSG, connection is up but no packets go in/out. I tried to enable
>>> debug messages in the driver, so when the WiFi stops to work I see that
>>> some "temperature/led" notify still going on in the driver, but nothing
>>> happens when I try to initiate a transfer (say to open a web page) - the
>>> log is silent, like the requests are getting stuck/dropped somewhere
>>> before reaching the driver. Is it a known issue? With the QoS disabled
>>> everything works hunky-dory, however I get 2x-4x faster download speed
>>> with QoS enabled (while it works.)
>>>
>>> I noticed that rtl92c_init_edca_param() isn't wired in the driver, so I
>>> suppose the QoS isn't implemented yet, right?
>>>
>>> If it is an expected behaviour, I think at least printing a warning
>>> message in the KMSG like "QoS unimplemented, you may expect problems"
>>> should be good enough to avoid confusion.
>>
>> As you have already seen, I decided to defer the more invasive patch. When
>> backporting to stable, the smaller the change the better.
>>
>> I have no knowledge of the internals of the RTL8192CU chip. As a result, the
>> kinds of changes I can make are limited. I do know that the chip does
>> implement QoS. I also noticed that the set_qos() callback routine was very
>> different in rtl8192ce than in rtl8192cu. Attached is an untested patch to
>> make the CU routine look like the CE version. Please see if it makes a
>> difference.
>>
>> Driver rtl8192cu has never been maintained by Realtek, and it will likely be
>> removed from the kernel in the next few cycles. As you are running a new
>> kernel, I would recommend rtl8xxxu instead. That driver has high
>> reliability, and the speed is improving. Your other option would be a
>> driver offered by the vendor of your particular device. Realtek used to
>> have these drivers on their web site, but they now seem to have been
>> removed. If your vendor does not have a driver,
>> http://www.edimax.com/edimax/mw/cufiles/files/download/Driver_Utility/trans
>> fer/Wireless/NIC/EW-7811Un/EW-7811Un_Linux_driver_v1.0.0.5.zip should work.
>>
>> Larry
> 
> On my Realtek RTL8188CE card (using the rtl8192ce driver) the patch seems to 
> fix the Issue (on Kernel 4.9.0). 
> 
> In contrast to what Dmitry Osipenko experienced, before the patch was applied, 
> the WIFI usually crashed already a few seconds instead of 3-15 minutes after 
> connecting to a network.
> 

The QoS issue is unrelated to the original bug. I think you are referring to the
"reorder_private_data.patch" here, it shouldn't affect anything other than the
USB. Maybe some other memory corruption is going on?

-- 
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ