linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] treewide: Move set_memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:25:53 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] treewide: Move set_memory_* functions away from cacheflush.h

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
> The set_memory_* APIs came out of a desire to have a better way to
> change memory attributes. Many of these attributes were linked to cache
> functionality so the prototypes were put in cacheflush.h. These days,
> the APIs have grown and have a much wider use than just cache APIs. To
> support this growth, split off set_memory_* and friends into a separate
> header file to avoid growing cacheflush.h for APIs that have nothing to
> do with caches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
> ---
> This came out of a comment Russell made while reviewing RODATA test cases
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-January/480855.html
> While the final result of that series was the rodata code was refactored into
> its own header file, the set_memory_* APIs are still out of place.

Yeah, this is a nice clean up to start on.

> This is a simple attempt at moving all the API stubs to their own file.
> Another idea I had was throwing set_memory_{x,nx,ro,rw} in an asm-generic
> file since those are commonly used for module setting across all arches.

It seems like asm-generic would be cleaner, yes? Only a few archs have
anything "special" happening in the resulting header files.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security