linux-kernel - Re: mm: deadlock between get_online_cpus/pcpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702072319200.8117@nanos>
Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2017 23:25:17 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mm: deadlock between get_online_cpus/pcpu_alloc

On Tue, 7 Feb 2017, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > I am always nervous when seeing hotplug locks being used in low level
> > code. It has bitten us several times already and those deadlocks are
> > quite hard to spot when reviewing the code and very rare to hit so they
> > tend to live for a long time.
> 
> Yep. Hotplug events are pretty significant. Using stop_machine_XXXX() etc
> would be advisable and that would avoid the taking of locks and get rid of all the
> ocmplexity, reduce the code size and make the overall system much more
> reliable.

Huch? stop_machine() is horrible and heavy weight. Don't go there, there
must be simpler solutions than that.

Thanks,

	tglx