lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a550fe7-a111-667a-2433-965d791fa6ab@denx.de>
Date:   Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:19:08 +0100
From:   Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/mxsfb: fix pixel clock polarity

On 02/08/2017 08:19 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:19 AM, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch> wrote:
>> On 2016-12-14 13:25, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 12/14/2016 09:48 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
>>>> The DRM subsystem specifies the pixel clock polarity from a
>>>> controllers perspective: DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE means
>>>> the controller drives the data on pixel clocks falling edge.
>>>> That is the controllers DOTCLK_POL=0 (Default is data launched
>>>> at negative edge).
>>>>
>>>> Also change the data enable logic to be high active by default
>>>> and only change if explicitly requested via bus_flags. With
>>>> that defaults are:
>>>> - Data enable: high active
>>>> - Pixel clock polarity: controller drives data on negative edge
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
>>>
>>
>> This seems not have made into drm-next yet. Not sure what the plan is
>> here, who will pick this up? There is also another fix on ML for the
>> same driver ("drm: mxsfb: Fix crash when provided invalid DT bindings").
> 
> By default, driver maintainers are expected to pick up driver patches.
> Exception is trivial patches by newcomers, to get them on board fast
> (and avoid frustration when a maintainer isn't around). drm-misc and
> Dave by default don't pick up anything.

Aha, OK.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ