[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170208135742.GE7339@8bytes.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:57:42 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] iommu/exynos: Make use of iommu_device_register
interface
Hi Marek,
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 01:36:15PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >+ ret = iommu_device_sysfs_add(&data->iommu, &pdev->dev, NULL,
> >+ "sysmmu.%pa", &ioaddr);
>
> Can we stick to the common name across the /sysfs and use
> dev_name(data->sysmmu)
> or even dev_name(dev) here?
>
> ret = iommu_device_sysfs_add(&data->iommu, &pdev->dev, NULL,
> dev_name(dev));
That means that we have multiple 'struct device' with the same name,
no? I think will lead to confusion when using dev_printk, as its not
clear anymore which device is refered to in the message.
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists