lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:57:42 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] iommu/exynos: Make use of iommu_device_register
 interface

Hi Marek,

On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 01:36:15PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >+	ret = iommu_device_sysfs_add(&data->iommu, &pdev->dev, NULL,
> >+				     "sysmmu.%pa", &ioaddr);
> 
> Can we stick to the common name across the /sysfs and use
> dev_name(data->sysmmu)
> or even dev_name(dev) here?
> 
> ret = iommu_device_sysfs_add(&data->iommu, &pdev->dev, NULL,
> dev_name(dev));

That means that we have multiple 'struct device' with the same name,
no? I think will lead to confusion when using dev_printk, as its not
clear anymore which device is refered to in the message.


	Joerg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ