[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170208144801.GZ6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 15:48:01 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: jeyu@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] module: Optimize search_module_extables()
While looking through the __ex_table stuff I found that we do a linear
lookup of the module. Also fix up a comment.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/module.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 3d8f126208e3..7bcdc35dbf95 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -4165,22 +4165,23 @@ const struct exception_table_entry *search_module_extables(unsigned long addr)
struct module *mod;
preempt_disable();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(mod, &modules, list) {
- if (mod->state == MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED)
- continue;
- if (mod->num_exentries == 0)
- continue;
+ mod = __module_address(addr);
+ if (!mod)
+ goto out;
- e = search_extable(mod->extable,
- mod->extable + mod->num_exentries - 1,
- addr);
- if (e)
- break;
- }
+ if (!mod->num_exentries)
+ goto out;
+
+ e = search_extable(mod->extable,
+ mod->extable + mod->num_exentries - 1,
+ addr);
+out:
preempt_enable();
- /* Now, if we found one, we are running inside it now, hence
- we cannot unload the module, hence no refcnt needed. */
+ /*
+ * Now, if we found one, we are running inside it now, hence
+ * we cannot unload the module, hence no refcnt needed.
+ */
return e;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists