lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a52ce1c-d570-ce1d-16a5-e4785bcef95f@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Feb 2017 12:14:04 -0500
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xenbus: Neaten xenbus_va_dev_error

On 02/08/2017 11:05 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 10:33 -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 02/08/2017 06:33 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> This function error patch can be simplified, so do so.
>>>
>>> Remove fail: label and somewhat obfuscating, used once "error_path"
>>> function.
> btw: I left it alone, but likely
>
> #define PRINTF_BUFFER_SIZE 4096
>
> is probably excessive as the maximum printk
> buffer is 1024.
>
> The xenbus_write might be longer though so
> maybe it's OK to use 4096, but there is some
> inequivalence there.
>

xenbus_write() handles writes up to 4K. However we are filling the
buffer with sprintf() which I assume is limited to 1K too so it indeed
doesn't seem useful to have PRINTF_BUFFER_SIZE set to 4.

-boris

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ