linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] arm64: efi: add EFI stub

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <8792A751-3557-4D81-921B-F544EEE38811@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 8 Feb 2017 17:40:35 +0000
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
        Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] arm64: efi: add EFI stub


> On 8 Feb 2017, at 17:03, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:35:02AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> On 02/08/2017 10:29 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>>>>> +       status = handle_cmdline_files(sys_table, image, cmdline_ptr,
>>>>>>> +                                     "initrd=", dram_base + SZ_512M,
>>>>>>> +                                     (unsigned long *)&initrd_addr,
>>>>>>> +                                     (unsigned long *)&initrd_size);
>>>>> 
>>>>> So I know this patch is almost three years old, but why is there a
>>>>> 512M limit on the initrd size?
>>>>> 
>>> How do you reckon this constitutes a limit?
>> 
>> handle_cmdline_files() calls efi_high_alloc() with that limit.  I'm
>> still trying to understand all the details myself, but apparently
>> our firmware and initrd need to fit within the first 512MB because
>> of dram_base + SZ_512M. When we change "dram_base + SZ_512M" to
>> "~0", everything works.
> 
> Just to check, how big is that initrd?
> 
> I guess it's possible that there simply isn't sufficient contiguous free
> memory in that range, even if the initrd isn't that large. Can you share
> the EFI memory map dump from booting with efi=debug?
> 
> We originally needed to restrict this to ensure that the kernel could
> map the initrd (and I think the 512M restriction specifically was
> inherited from the DTB mapping restriction). Since then, we have relaxed
> things in the kernel, and today Documentation/arm64/booting.txt says:
> 
>    If an initrd/initramfs is passed to the kernel at boot, it must
>    reside entirely within a 1 GB aligned physical memory window of
>    up to 32 GB in size that fully covers the kernel Image as well.
> 
> ... so I think the EFI stub should be able to take advantage of that
> relaxation.
> 
> Ard?
> 

Interestingly enough, this code originates on 32-bit ARM, where the linear mapping is only 800 MB so I suspect that may have something to do with it.

I agree the stub should simply follow the rules laid out in booting.txt. I think nobody hit this because it is usually GRUB that loads the initrd not the EFI stub