[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170208174833.phzyn2off32my5eu@t450s.lan>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 18:48:33 +0100
From: Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@...ndarydevices.com>
To: Dan MacDonald <allcoms@...il.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>
Subject: Re: ARM imx.6 SATA speed regression
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:02:40PM +0000, Dan MacDonald wrote:
> Thankfully there is an archive of older Arch ARM packages which should
> reduce the amount amount of bisection / compiling I may need to do and
> they have packages for most stable kernels between 4.9.0 and 4.9.8
>
> http://tardis.tiny-vps.com/aarm/packages/l/linux-armv7/
How did that go?
I've tried 'hdparm -Tt' on several kernel version and couldn't confirm
your obervations:
4.9.0:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 366 MB in 0.51 seconds = 733382 kB/s
Timing buffered disk reads: 221 MB in 3.00 seconds = 75411 kB/s
4.9.8:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 358 MB in 0.51 seconds = 717720 kB/s
Timing buffered disk reads: 221 MB in 3.00 seconds = 75244 kB/s
4.10-rc7:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 360 MB in 0.50 seconds = 723576 kB/s
Timing buffered disk reads: 244 MB in 3.00 seconds = 83024 kB/s
Are you sure rolling back to 4.9.0 improves the perf in your case?
Regards,
Gary
Powered by blists - more mailing lists