lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ecede753-026c-9d59-b4ac-4eae3ff2fdbb@skidata.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:44:17 +0100
From:   Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@...data.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Richard Leitner <dev@...l1n.net>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>, <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: misc: add USB251xB/xBi Hi-Speed Hub Controller
 Driver

On 02/08/2017 09:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 21:03 +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
>> Should I keep my inline {clr,set}_bit_in_byte() 
>> functions an use BIT() in there, or delete them and use BIT()
>> directly 
>> in usb251xb_get_ofdata() ?
> 
> Does it make any sense?
> 
> Even just name of your function is longer than what it substitutes.

Well, you're right :-)
So I'll change that for v5.

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ