linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] usb: misc: add USB251xB/xBi Hi-Speed Hub Controller Driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:44:17 +0100
From:   Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@...data.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Richard Leitner <dev@...l1n.net>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>, <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: misc: add USB251xB/xBi Hi-Speed Hub Controller
 Driver

On 02/08/2017 09:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 21:03 +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
>> Should I keep my inline {clr,set}_bit_in_byte() 
>> functions an use BIT() in there, or delete them and use BIT()
>> directly 
>> in usb251xb_get_ofdata() ?
> 
> Does it make any sense?
> 
> Even just name of your function is longer than what it substitutes.

Well, you're right :-)
So I'll change that for v5.

Thanks!