[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ecede753-026c-9d59-b4ac-4eae3ff2fdbb@skidata.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:44:17 +0100
From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@...data.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Richard Leitner <dev@...l1n.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: misc: add USB251xB/xBi Hi-Speed Hub Controller
Driver
On 02/08/2017 09:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 21:03 +0100, Richard Leitner wrote:
>> Should I keep my inline {clr,set}_bit_in_byte()
>> functions an use BIT() in there, or delete them and use BIT()
>> directly
>> in usb251xb_get_ofdata() ?
>
> Does it make any sense?
>
> Even just name of your function is longer than what it substitutes.
Well, you're right :-)
So I'll change that for v5.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists