lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170209085346.GZ6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:53:46 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] sched/core: Remove the tsk_cpus_allowed() wrapper

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 07:34:18PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So the original intention of tsk_cpus_allowed() was to 'future-proof'
> the field - but it's pretty ineffectual at that, because half of
> the code uses ->cpus_allowed directly ...
> 
> Also, the wrapper makes the code longer than the original expression!

I still object to taking this out without replacement. This leaves RT
stranded.

If you want to implement it differently do that, but don't blindly wreck
stuff for them.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ