lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 09 Feb 2017 10:26:19 +0100
From:   Stephan Müller <smueller@...onox.de>
To:     Alden Tondettar <alden.tondettar@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: Don't overwrite CRNG state in crng_initialize()

Am Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2017, 02:04:32 CET schrieb Alden Tondettar:

Hi Alden,

> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 07:47:25AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 08:31:26PM -0700, Alden Tondettar wrote:
> > > In short, the situation is:
> > > 
> > > A) No usable hardware RNG or arch_get_random() (or we don't trust it...)
> > 
> > Wait, why would you not trust arch_get_random()?  Is it broken somehow
> > on some arches?  If so, why not fix that as well?
> 
> arch_get_random() makes use of RDRAND and similar CPU features. Some people
> do not wish to trust black-box RNG implementations.

Furthermore, this function is only implemented on x86. On other arches, it is 
a noop.

Ciao
Stephan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ