lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2017 13:04:56 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Arushi <arushisinghal19971997@...il.com>
Cc:     w.d.hubbs@...il.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, kirk@...sers.ca,
        speakup@...ux-speakup.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org, chris@...-brannons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] staging: rtl8192e: Aligning the * on each line in
 block comments

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:13:34PM +0530, Arushi wrote:
> This patch fixes the issue by aligning the * on each line in block comments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arushi <arushisinghal19971997@...il.com>

Do you really sign documents with just this single word for a name?

> ---
> [Patch v1] is rejected as the changes done is not correct and is not following the linux kernel coding style in file drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_decpc.c as * on each line in block was not correctly alligned.[Patch v2] is rejected for not to mention the cause of rejection of [Patch v1] but warnings is corrected.The cause of rejection of [Patch v3] is that the mention of the cause was not in the correct format and is not descriptive.In [Patch v4] didn't send patch message to all the list members so asked to again repatch it.

Please properly use line-feeds, this is unreadable.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ