[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702091620270.3604@nanos>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:21:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] x86/timers for 4.10
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 16:07 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 12:44 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > > > [ 0.177102] [Firmware Bug]: TSC ADJUST differs: Reference CPU0:
> > > > > -6495898515190607 CPU1: -6495898517158354
> > > >
> > > > Yay, another "clever" BIOS ....
> > >
> > > Oh yeah, that reminds me...
> > >
> > > I met one such box, and the adjustment code did salvage it, but I had
> > > to cheat a little for it to do so reliably, as it would sometimes still
> > > see a delta of 1 or 2 whole cycles, and hand me a useless wreck instead
> > > quick like bunny big box.
> >
> > Can you share your cheatery ?
>
> I didn't keep it, it was just a bandaid for a fleeting use, dirt simple
> ignore microscopic delta.
Can you send me the dmesg output of that box for a good and a bad case or
don't you have access to it anymore?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists